The point is that this is how the world is viewing us.Fourteen of the 16 people killed in UP’s violence at the time of writing were killed by bullets fired by the police, but our Prime Minister’s narrative is the violence is by the protesters. Those Muslims who ultimately escape would still have to live with the trauma of not knowing whether they will be facing this trial. Let us have a look at what the undisputed facts are. When this came to light, last week, the Union home secretary sent out a tweet saying “Indian citizens” would not have to declare their religion. The question is why are they looking at us in unambiguous and disapproving terms. “As repression in India gets worse, notable figures remain silent” (Washington Post, January 4). In fact I am on their side. The process for putting them on this list was not transparent and Gauhati high court and India’s Supreme Court colluded in this, using reckless language such as “external aggression”. Whether we agree with the world is not the point: many Indians, and particularly Hindus, will disagree that things are bad in India or that this government is deliberately bullying its citizens. The problem of course is who decides who is a citizen and who is an immigrant.” The report said that President Ram Nath Kovind in his address to the Lok Sabha on June 20 said that the government had decided to implement the National Register of Citizens on priority basis. Here is what the world is saying about our nation in 2020. Merely doing what has been mentioned above would pretty much take care of the Muslims of India permanently. “As India violence gets worse, police are accused of abusing Muslims” (New York Times, January 3).The government does not even need to build all the concentration camps, called “detention centres”, around the country. FEMA 21(R)/2018-RB which said that “A person being a citizen of Afghanistan, Bangladesh or Pakistan belonging to minority communities in those countries, namely, Hindus, https://www.lskmj.com/product/barrier/ Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and Christians who is residing in India and has been granted a Long Term Visa by the Central government may purchase only one residential immovable property in India as dwelling unit for self-occupation and only one immovable property for carrying out self-employment…”How would the RBI know which religion individuals belonged to? Would we start now having to declare our religion to open a bank account? This was not thought through by the government and not noticed at the time.” The report says that “In pursuance of sub-rule(4) of rule 3 of the Citizenship (Registration of Citizens and Issue of National Identity Cards) Rules, 2003, the Central government hereby decides to prepare and update the Population Register… and the field work for house-to-house enumeration throughout the country except Assam for collection of information relating to all persons who are usually residing within the jurisdiction of local registrar shall be undertaken between the first day of April, 2020 to September 30, 2020,” said a notification issued by Vivek Joshi, registrar general of Citizen Registration and Census Commissioner.Second, on August 3, 2019, PTI reported: “Govt to prepare National Population Register to lay foundation for pan-India NRC. Such D-Voters had no right to vote in elections once they had been put on this list. The truth is that the facts are against us. This is why the world is looking on at India with distaste and dismay, and who can say that they are wrong in thinking about us in that way?. “‘We are not safe’: India’s Muslims tell of wave of police brutality” (Guardian, January 3). What would happen in the interim? Along with their D-voter status, would come a loss of their passport and license, their right over their property (because only non-Muslims are allowed, according to the RBI circular), their right to have a bank account and a job.Third, on March 26, 2018, the Reserve Bank of India issued notification No. Can we understand now why they are leading the protests? They have zero confidence in the words and assurances of the Prime Minister and home minister, and I do not blame them. There is a reason that the protests in India against the citizenship laws are being led by India’s Muslims. First, there will be a bureaucratic purge of Muslim names from the voter list. India’s Prime Minister is either ignorant or lying when he says that there has been no discussion of NRC.Jan 5, 2020, 2:56 am IST The government does not even need to build all the concentration camps, called “detention centres”, around the country. The Financial Times asks: “India risks sliding into a second Emergency”. Conservative papers that this government wants to think well of it think that India is in trouble.First, in Assam, the NRC process began with local verification officers who began striking off people from the voters’ list, calling them D-Voters (doubtful voters). People hold placards while protesting against the CAA and NRC at Rajghat, New Delhi, on Saturday. They are the target of the laws and they know this. Then these people who are “doubtful” will have to present themselves before other bureaucrats and prove their innocence.The facts in the minds of Muslims are clear, and they are as follows: This government has been planning for some time to introduce a process which will weed out India’s Muslims

Anurag Jha as Jatayu, in the threshings of death presents a fine performance. Apart from being visited by Presidents and Prime Ministers, and being the first programme to be aired when television came to India in 1967 in B/W and only in satellite villages, Doordarshan has rerecorded this work twice https://www.lskmj.com/product/sliding-gate-openers/ more in black and white and three times more in colour. Songs like Vande Mataram, “Sur bana hamara” and “Ao ham milke banayenge Swacch Bharat” formed the base for a production where different dance forms blended without getting in one another’s way. The soundtape with background dialogues after all the initial research in the well known voices of Manohar Singh, Abhinav Chaturvedi and Shanti Sharma, scripted by Arvind Kumar, Neelabh and Ashk with music in the voices of Shanti Sharma, Jwala Prasad, Jeetendra Singh, Indu Prakash, Anuradha Nirala, Hameed, Manjeet Singh and Mahesh Pandey, have provided the unchanging rock base for the production. From initial shows held at the Ramilila grounds on a stage of magnificent proportions made out of converting a parking lot, to being staged at the Kamani auditorium to its present venue in the open grounds of the Bharatiya Kala Kendra, the ballet had had its shifts — necessitating no mean accommodation in terms of organisation. Not even Ramanand Sagar’s Ramayan could dent the popularity of this production, which in freestyle technique, not wedded to any classical dance form, makes for universal appeal. The Bharat Milap scene in one movement of Bharat’s prostrate form, from one end of the stage sliding across the entire space to land at Rama’s feet at the other end, catches the younger brother’s undisguised loyalty.   

While the backdrop visuals were extremely helpful in portraying actions like Hanuman crossing the sea, or showing the optical illusions of Meghnad assuming a double image, and enriching certain scenes showing eagles like Jatayu zooming through the air long beak in front, they were often for this critic very distracting. While one could see movement segments in the past inspired by different classical styles, the choreography today sees a predominance of Mayurbhaj Chhau like movements along with folk form movements. And symbolising through an amalgamation of dance forms, a larger societal cooperation, the work managed to hold the audience together in the finale, through a theme like Swacch Bharat — without sounding didactic.The writer is an eminent dance critic.Oct 24, 2019, 1:39 am IST Many more Ramlila productions have now commenced all over the capital. Manthara was another very competently portrayed character. Starting with Valmiki’s hidden muse, gushing out as the Ramayana verses, after witnessing the ‘Kraunch Vadh’ of mating birds thanks to the hunter’s cruel arrow, to the coronation of Rama, the story progresses at a very fast clip. The dancer as Sita suited the role. Film extracts of Asavari’s old productions, Sanmati on Lakshmi Bai of Jhansi based on Ramdhari Singh Dinkar’s verses and their production, Gandhi, based on Ramachandra Gandhi’s play written in 1996, were screened, with the festival curtain-raiser being the conferring of the Lalit Arpan Sammaan on this year’s select awardees from the world of art — namely dance critic Dr Sunil Kothari, Shobha Deepak Singh, director Shriram Bharatiya Kala Kendra, Mangatram Sharma, Mohiniyattam dancer Bharati Shivaji and column writer/dancer/teacher of Odissi Sharon Lowen’. Constant provocation for SBKK to keep wringing the new touches!Seems to have been a week for dance drama productions, with Lalit Arpan, the annual festival mounted by Shovana Narayan’s institution Asavari in memory of her mother, the main inspiration behind her artistic career. From a fortune spent on daily flowers and garlands and borrowed jewellery, to today’s handmade flowers and jewellery under the direct artistic guidance of production director Shobha Deepak Singh (whose own evolution as a producer, over the years this work has gained from), to dancers who had become bynames for the main characters having left, not to speak of production advisors and choreographers, the cast of dancers frequently shifting, change has been a constant factor. Upendra Singh as Dashrath and Swapan Mazumdar as Ravan were effective. Some frozen tableaus of persecution, the rich costumes, the delightful palanquin in which Sita is carried in the scene where she takes leave of her parents proceeding to her newly wedded husband’s home, the hut in Panchavati , the myriad lamps in the last scene, Ram and Sita and Lakshman crossing the river on a boat with Guha and much more are all unforgettable images.  

Among the solo recitals Shovana’s student Komal Biswal reflecting Gandhi’s ideas on women’s emancipation and empowerment, acquitted herself well. Upendra Singh as Dashrath and Swapan Mazumdar as Ravan were effective. The best of the characterisations came from the dancer who took the role of Kaikeyi —her slow mind change, the strutting swagger despite being isolated by the angry subjects very convincingly brought out. The role of Vishwamitra, however, neither in physical presence nor enactment, was assertive enough. Notwithstanding involved rendition, the choreography by Shovana, Mahesh Pawar and Shailaja Nalwade, in an overplay of Kathak pirouettes (chakkars — which gave the viewers a head spin), evoked a restlessness — the quiet intensity and tragedy of a human situation where Karna, after a life of unfairness, being even in death denied fairness. This multimedia sound and light extravaganza, bridging the gulf between the divine and the human, continues to create its magical world for over two-and-a-half hours of strutting gods and demons. It was all of 63 years ago that the Shriram Bharatiya Kala Kendra, which had been in existence for almost a decade by then, launched the first edition of its magnum opus Ramayana Ballet, with the then Prime minister Jawaharlal Nehru in 1957 donating money from the Prime Minister’s Relief Fund for the first Ramlila. Why when a peacock dance is being performed on stage should the backdrop flash a colourful peacock with feathers fanned out dancing? Some of the stage formations got totally lost with the predominance of overwhelming visuals.  And Shovana Narayan’s female disciple as Karna, when male dancers were in the troupe, despite her genuine efforts, just did not look the role. In a way the absence of a status quo has helped in injecting new ideas saving the producers from complacency, and ensuring a freshness of approach.The Swacch Bharat dance ballet by Kavita Thakur and group incorporating Kathak, Mayurbhaj Chhau, and Odissi and Bharatanatyam dances, did a very intelligent job of ensuring within the choreography, short solo spurts for each of the dance forms, with the total crew coming together in a “tadharita radharana dheem tarana”. But the actor who played Vishwamitra, was not assertive enough. The other very evocative role was that of Shabari, sensitively enacted.Asavari’s dance drama Rashmirathi, based on Ramdhari Singh Dinkar’s work, had as its central figure Mahabharata’s Karna, arguably the most unfortunate of all the main players in the epic. In the other envisaged solo programme dancer Mullah Afzar Khan from Singapore, by including in the programme his student, Purush Priya, who still has a long way to go, botched up his performance, neither nritta in Dhamar and Teental nor the Shiva/Shakti duet based on Ramdhari Dinkar’s poem communicating to the audience. This year, the festival was built round two significant themes, this being the 150th birthday of Mahatma Gandhi and also the 111th birthday of Rashtrakavi Ramdhari Singh Dinkar.Many more Ramlila productions have now commenced all over the capital

Mr Jaitley was no mass leader. But he had an astute political mind.K. He helped restore faith in a sliding economy, shoring up his side when it was under attack for a spate of mob-lynchings. In Mr Jaitley’s passing, the BJP has lost a far-sighted, seasoned leader. His star only grew over the last few years of his life, especially with his witty, savvy persona on Twiter.Aug 25, 2019, 12:00 am IST Jaitley star only grew over the last few years of his life, especially with his witty, savvy persona on Twiter. This, besides personal loyalty, made Prime Minister Narendra Modi repose deep trust in him. https://www.lskmj.com/product/sliding-gate-openers/ Former Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley (Photo: Twitter) Former finance minister Arun Jaitley, who was only 66 when he died on Saturday after a long illness, played a formative rise in his party’s transformation from provincial politics to storming the national stage.Arun Jaitley was a BJP-style moderniser and once became an acolyte of L.Jaitley was a sophisticated propagandist and politician who could sound persuasive even when holding a weak hand, for instance, when litterateurs and prominent cultural figures returned national awards to protest the Modi regime. His prominent rise as a Supreme Court lawyer helped his own cause and that of the party, too. Advani, who, at the time, appeared keen to turn the BJP into a moderate Right-wing party with religious orientations, like the Christian Democrats in Europe. This contributed to his ideological finetuning. The Lok Sabha eluded him..Mr Jaitley’s westernism, alongside his Hindu-Hindi self, struck a chord when his party was trying to strike it big, finding itself on the national stage. In his college days, he was the all-India chief of the Akhil Bhartiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP), the students’ front of the RSS.The deceased top-order ruling party politician made cultural revanchism, appealing to large cross sections of the people — his Parliamentary interventions in Hindi appealed to the common man, his polished English made him a star in the eyes of educated, globalised Indians, even those who did not agree with his views

The threat to use China’s rich supply of rare earths as leverage in the conflict has contributed to sharp losses in US stocks.The report said China has kept its word throughout 11 rounds of talks and will honor its commitments if a trade agreement is reached.Wang said China had been forced to “take forceful measures in response” to US actions and denied China had backtracked on its earlier commitments. study showed the US figure could be inflated by as much as 20%..“That shows that the deepening trade restrictions hurt US workers,” Wang said.Several leading U. Beijing: China fired back at the US Sunday over the two nations’ trade dispute, issuing a report that blamed the conflict on the Trump administration but refrained from escalating the trade war.Linda Lim, a professor at Ross School of Business at the University of Michigan, said the report does not represent an escalation on China’s part, but rather reiterates the government’s position in a clear and measured way that leaves the door open for negotiations.The US deficit with China has actually been worsening since tariffs were first imposed, Wang said, pointing to a 50 per cent decline in soy bean exports to China and a drop-off in US auto sales in the country.“They threw the ball back into the US court,” she said.He said the US had made unacceptable demands, including on tariffs and compulsory requirements that infringed on Chinese sovereignty.Wang Shouwen, China’s vice commerce minister and deputy international trade representative, said China would issue more detailed information on the unreliable entities list soon, but that it was aimed at enterprises that “violated market principles” and cut supplies of components to Chinese businesses for non-commercial reasons.He also said many of those exports were produced by foreign companies operating in China and that Chinese firms often pocketed only a relatively meager fee for assembling. However, Wang questioned how much China was actually benefiting from its surplus, saying a joint Chinese-U. Subtracting the US surplus in the services trade with China, the actual surplus came to just USD 152. The Trump administration has imposed 25 per cent tariffs on USD 250 billion in Chinese imports and is planning to tax the USD 300 billion in imports that have so far been spared. It accused the US of backtracking three times over the course of the talks by introducing new tariffs and other conditions beyond what was agreed on. Foremost among them is lithium, the main component in modern batteries. Over recent days, China has been mobilizing its representatives abroad to sell its position with foreign audiences, while the domestic propaganda apparatus has been working overtime to convince the public of the righteousness of the government’s stance.“If some countries use China’s rare earth metals to produce products to contain China’s development, this is unacceptable by standards of both minds and hearts,” Wang said.The report said China has kept its word throughout 11 rounds of talks and will honor its commitments if a trade agreement is reached.The report, delivered at a Sunday morning news conference, appears to be a bid to shore up China’s arguments and justify its position in the face of what looks to be a protracted dispute. The average US family, meanwhile, will pay an additional USD 831 for consumer items over the year due to the higher tariffs, he said, while the dispute’s impact on businesses could end up costing 2.Trump has touted the tariff increases as a way of reducing China’s trade surplus with the U.23 million US jobs overall.”“A country’s sovereignty and dignity must be respected, and any agreement reached by the two sides must be based on equality and mutual benefit,” the report said.China’s statement that it intends to publish such a list follows additional measures last week that deepened the bite of US sanctions imposed on Huawei in mid-May.Sunday’s report lays out China’s argument for blaming Washington for the frictions as well as the costs to both sides, and said China has room for fiscal policy changes to maintain the health of its economy amid the dispute.-based global technology standards-setting groups announced restrictions on Huawei’s participation in their activities under US Commerce Department rules that bar the sale and transfer of US technology to Huawei without government approval.S. Trump announced last week that he would impose 5 per cent tariffs on Mexican imports starting June 10 if the Mexicans don’t do more to stop the surge of Central American migrants across the southern US border.She said the report is a public relations win for China’s government at a time when US President Donald Trump’s trade policy is antagonizing other US trading partners, most recently Mexico.The US has accused China of stealing trade secrets and forced technology transfers.6 billion last year, Wang said. It also escalated the stakes this month by putting Chinese telecom giant Huawei on a blacklist that effectively bars US companies from supplying it with computer chips, software and other components without government approval.“But the more the US government is offered, the more it wants,” it said, accusing America’s negotiators of “resorting to intimidation and coercion., which hit a staggering USD 379 billion last year. “You give them an inch, they take a yard,” he said.S.The report from the Cabinet spokesman’s office said China won’t back down on “major issues of principle,” but offered no sense of whether or how the world’s second largest economy might retaliate against US tariffs on goods manufactured in China.Wang also repeated suggestions that China could restrict the export of exotic minerals known as rare earths that are widely used in electric cars and cellphones.Beijing responded by imposing tariffs on USD 60 billion worth of US products, which went into effect Saturday.S.The threat to use China’s rich supply https://www.lskmj.com of rare earths as leverage in the conflict has contributed to sharp losses in US stocks and sliding long-term bond yields. It also retaliated against the US blacklisting of Huawei by announcing Friday that it will establish its own list of “unreliable entities” consisting of foreign businesses, corporations and individuals

Gambhir said the performance of openers is crucial for success Down Under."It is got to be a challenge (in Australia). Plus they have the bowling attack to hurt any opposition. It will not be a cakewalk. If you go to Australia and playing against Mitchell Stark and Pat Cummins, you have to be ready," he added. There were not enough opening partnerships. They have really exciting players like Shaun Marsh or Aaron Finch. He has started off his test career on a very good note but there will be far bigger and far difficult challenges waiting for him," said Gambhir. If you want to succeed overseas, you need a good platform," said Gambhir. We talk about the batting because they don’t have Smith and Warner but they still have formidable batting in their backyard.  "England manage to win in Australia because they went one month early. He has his individuality and Sehwag has his own. They played three or four warm-up matches.. But former India opener Gautam Gambhir says one needs to think twice before comparing the young Mumbai batsman with Sehwag."He has just started his career and there is a long way to go.Gambhir said Prithvi would face sterner test in future. Playing Australia in Australia will be a threat," he added.India will travel to Australia end of this year for four Tests, three ODIs and as many T20s. If you are going overseas, your bowlers should have bowled 80 or 100 overs so your body gets used to it."It is important for openers to succeed https://www.lskmj.com/product/industrial-gate-opener/industrial-gate-opener-ls-gy.html in Australia because that is the department where India struggled during the England tour. I have never believed in comparisons. "Prithvi’s very talented and that’s why he is there in the team. They have the best off-spinner in the world right now. He has just played one match and Sehwag has played around 100 Tests," said Gambhir.Mumbai: Prithvi Shaw, who slammed a stroke-filled hundred on his Test debut, has drawn comparisons with the likes of Sachin Tendulkar and Virender Sehwag.The veteran left-hander said India should reach Australia early in order to get acclimatise to the conditions